New Jersey Senate Bill S3591

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/19/24
• Refer: 9/19/24

Caption

Prohibits ownership of certain protected land adjacent to military facilities in State by certain foreign governments and persons.

Impact

Under S3591, existing foreign owners of protected land can retain their interests for up to five years post-enactment, after which they must sell to entities that do not fall under the definition of foreign governments or persons. This stipulation not only applies to property acquired on or after the effective date but also covers certain exceptions where foreign entities might gain ownership—such as through debt collection processes, provided they comply with the subsequent transfer requirements. This approach aims to mitigate disruption while ensuring gradual divestment of foreign interests in sensitive properties.

Summary

Senate Bill S3591 aims to prohibit certain foreign governments and persons from acquiring, purchasing, or otherwise obtaining any legal interest in 'protected land' adjacent to military facilities in New Jersey. Specifically, the bill defines protected land as any parcel within ten miles of a military facility. The legislation is a response to national security concerns regarding foreign interests in sensitive areas, especially those near military operations. It seeks to eliminate risks associated with foreign ownership that could potentially compromise military readiness or operational secrecy.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding this bill include the balance between safeguarding national security and the potential implications for property rights and the real estate market in New Jersey. Concerns have been raised regarding the broad definitions of foreign individuals and governments, which may unintentionally affect foreign investors or developments that do not pose a threat. Some stakeholders express fears that the restrictions might discourage legitimate foreign investment in the state, leading to economic ramifications. Additionally, debates may arise about how the bill aligns with international treaties, especially regarding expropriation and property rights.