If successfully enacted, HJR12 could significantly alter the landscape of state-federal relations by imposing stricter regulations on federal spending and jurisdiction. New Mexico's legislature, which already operates under strict balanced budget requirements, aims to protect its citizens from what they view as unsustainable federal fiscal policies. The resolution echoes sentiments that increasing federal rules create burdens on local economies, signaling a desire for greater state independence and responsibility.
Summary
HJR12, introduced by Representatives Randall T. Pettigrew, John Block, and Jimmy G. Mason during the 56th Legislature of New Mexico, seeks to call for a convention under Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution. The resolution requests that Congress facilitate this convention when two-thirds of the states apply for it, with the goal of proposing amendments to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its jurisdiction, and set term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. This initiative arises from concerns about the rising national debt and perceived federal overreach in state affairs.
Contention
The main points of contention surrounding HJR12 involve the implications of convening a constitutional convention. Critics express concerns that such conventions can lead to unintended consequences, potentially resulting in amendments that could undermine federal protections and laws beneficial to the public. Supporters, however, argue that this approach is necessary for restoring fiscal responsibility and curbing overreach, framing it as a step toward greater accountability in government.