New Mexico House Bill HM27

New Mexico 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/24

Caption

Condemn Governor's Executive Order

Impact

The bill underscores significant tensions between state leadership and law enforcement on issues of firearms regulation. It highlights the backlash from both local and state officials, including Democratic leaders and law enforcement representatives, who expressed concerns regarding the constitutionality of the executive order. This opposition suggests that HM27 may serve not only as a political statement but also as a platform for wider discussions on gun rights and public safety measures in New Mexico. The implications of the bill reflect unease regarding centralized authority in public health emergencies, especially when such measures may impact individual rights.

Summary

House Memorial 27 (HM27) addresses the controversial Executive Order 2023-130 issued by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, which prohibited the possession of firearms in certain cities and counties in New Mexico, citing a public health emergency due to gun violence. The memorial condemns the governor for what is seen as an infringement on constitutional rights, particularly the right to bear arms as protected by both the New Mexico Constitution and the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. HM27 argues that such actions by the governor amount to malfeasance in office and calls for her impeachment and removal from office.

Contention

Significant contention exists around the governor's use of executive power and the balance of state rights versus constitutional protections. Critics see the order as a dangerous precedent for governing during public health emergencies, arguing that it sets a perilous example for similar situations in the future. Additionally, the contention is amplified by the fact that many law enforcement officers and local officials refuse to enforce such orders that they believe are unconstitutional. This unyielding stance among state officials creates a rift between local governance and state authority, leading to further discussions on the limits of executive orders.