Revises provisions governing higher education. (BDR 34-464)
The impact of AB217 on state laws includes the establishment of clearer guidelines around fee waivers for homeless pupils, specifically mandating the Board of Regents to act instead of providing them with discretionary power. The bill will also enhance the support for these students by requiring that the designated Liaison be knowledgeable about federal education benefits and the obstacles faced by homeless individuals. This change in law is aimed at creating a more inclusive educational environment for students facing housing insecurity in Nevada.
Assembly Bill 217 (AB217) primarily aims to revise provisions governing higher education in Nevada, focusing particularly on supporting homeless and unaccompanied pupils. The legislation mandates that the Board of Regents grant fee waivers for registration and laboratory costs to individuals identified as homeless or unaccompanied before turning 25 years old. This initiative is designed to reduce financial barriers to post-secondary education, thus increasing access for vulnerable students. Additionally, the bill ensures that institutions within the Nevada System of Higher Education provide pertinent contact information for designated Liaisons who assist with these provisions.
General sentiment surrounding AB217 is positive, as it aligns with efforts to bolster educational accessibility and equity for underserved populations. Proponents of the bill argue that removing financial barriers is crucial for homeless pupils to pursue higher education. However, there may also be contentions regarding the execution and resource allocation of such waivers, particularly concerns about whether the institutions can meet the demands of adequately supporting the increased number of students eligible for financial assistance.
Notable points of contention may arise relating to the practicality of implementing the mandated changes, specifically in training Liaisons and the institutions’ ability to manage the increased workload. The focus on documentation requirements to confirm a student's status as homeless or unaccompanied can lead to criticisms regarding accessibility. Some legislators and advocates may express concerns that any rigorous documentation process could inadvertently discourage eligible students from applying for necessary support.