Nevada Assembly Bill AB321

Nevada 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/23
• Refer: 3/16/23
• Report Pass: 4/19/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Report Pass: 6/2/23
• Engrossed: 6/3/23
• Refer: 6/3/23
• Report Pass: 6/4/23
• Enrolled: 6/9/23
• Chaptered: 6/16/23
• Passed: 6/16/23

Caption

Makes various changes relating to public safety. (BDR 52-753)

Impact

The legislation strengthens existing laws protecting public utilities by establishing clear guidelines and standards for the sale and manufacturing of foil balloons. It introduces specific requirements such as testing for dielectric performance and using non-conductive materials where necessary. Additionally, the bill enhances penalties for individuals who commit assault or battery against utility workers and provides legal recourse for public utilities against damage to their infrastructure. The effect is a tighter framework for preserving public safety concerning utility employees and equipment.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 321 focuses on enhancing public safety regulations specifically concerning foil balloons, recognized as a significant hazard to electrical infrastructure. The bill initiates requirements on the manufacturing, selling, and distribution of foil balloons to ensure they meet performance standards regarding their dielectric performance. The intent is to mitigate risks associated with foil balloons contacting power lines, which can lead to power outages and potential fires. The bill mandates that if the required standards are not met, manufacturers and distributors may face penalties.

Contention

Discussions around AB321 highlighted the balance between regulation and consumer choice, with some stakeholders expressing concern about the potential economic implications for manufacturers and small businesses involved in the balloon industry. Furthermore, there were debates over the effectiveness of the proposed measures versus existing practices to ensure safety, indicating a division among legislators and interest groups regarding the best path forward for public safety and utility protection. Despite these concerns, the predominant view in the legislative assembly supported the need for protective measures, leading to the eventual passage of the bill.