Revises provisions relating to government administration. (BDR 22-526)
Impact
The bill aims to ensure consistency in the regulation of refrigerants across various jurisdictions within the state. By limiting local governments' ability to impose stricter regulations than those established by federal guidelines, the bill enhances the usability of approved refrigerants, which could facilitate more environmentally friendly practices in the construction industry. This approach is intended to streamline compliance for builders and developers who may otherwise face a patchwork of local rules that could hinder their use of modern refrigerants that meet industry safety standards.
Summary
Assembly Bill No. 97, introduced by Assemblywoman Hardy, relates to government administration and focuses on the regulation of refrigerants used in building and construction. The core provision of the bill states that governmental entities, including cities and counties, are prohibited from adopting any building codes or regulations that restrict the use of certain refrigerants classified as acceptable alternatives or substitutes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These restrictions are lifted as long as the equipment is compliant with standardized safety and installation practices set forth by the relevant industry authorities.
Contention
Despite its intentions to promote uniformity and compliance with EPA standards, AB97 has elicited concerns regarding local governance and public safety. Critics argue that the bill could undermine local authority, as cities and counties may have specific environmental or health concerns that necessitate stricter regulations on refrigerants. Furthermore, by voiding any existing or future local laws that conflict with this bill, the legislation raises questions about the balance of power between state and local governments, especially in managing environmental impacts and public health associated with cooling technologies.