Nevada 2023 Regular Session

Nevada Senate Bill SB112

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/8/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  

Caption

Revises provisions governing groundwater basin assessments. (BDR 48-600)

Impact

One of the significant changes introduced in the bill is the removal of the minimum charge of $1 for special assessments on water users in areas predominantly using groundwater for agricultural purposes. This maneuver allows for a maximum charge to be set, which can be adjusted based on the Consumer Price Index. The bill empowers the State Engineer to increase assessments, subject to county commissioner approval, thus giving local authorities a degree of oversight in the fee structure while potentially creating a more flexible revenue stream for state water management.

Summary

Senate Bill 112 revises the provisions governing groundwater basin assessments in Nevada to improve accountability and streamline financial provisions related to groundwater management. It prohibits the use of special assessment funds and general fund allocations from counties for salaries and expenses of certain personnel employed by the State Engineer. Instead, it sets forth new requirements for how such funds are to be handled while aiming to ensure that administrative expenses related to well supervision are adequately funded through assessments on water users.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB112 appears largely supportive of enhancing the management of Nevada's groundwater resources. Proponents argue that this measure could lead to more effective oversight and potentially improve groundwater sustainability. However, there are concerns about how the implementation could financially impact water users, especially farmers, who may face increased fees amid fluctuating agricultural markets. Discussions around the bill likely included the balance between ensuring adequate funding for water management while considering the economic pressure on those reliant on groundwater resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the implications of the financial changes brought by SB112. Critics may argue that removing the minimum assessment could lead to unpredictable costs for water rights holders, particularly in economically volatile times. With the authorization for the State Engineer to raise charges, there is a concern regarding the extent to which these increases could affect local water users. This aspect raises questions about the balance of power between the state and local agencies in charging for water resource management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1757

California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: climate goal: natural and working lands.

NV AB363

Revises provisions relating to groundwater boards. (BDR 48-385)

NV SB180

Revises provisions relating to groundwater boards. (BDR 48-597)

AZ SB1425

Rural groundwater management areas; establishment.

AZ HB2714

Rural groundwater management areas; establishment

LA SB203

Establishes withdrawal limits on the use of groundwater. (8/1/13)

CT SB00941

An Act Delaying Implementation Of Certain Standards And Sampling Requirements Upon The Detection Of Pollutants Causing Contamination Of Soil, Groundwater Or Public Or Private Drinking Water Wells.

CT HB05119

An Act Concerning The Remediation Account For Dry Cleaning Establishments And Regulated Activity On Certain Sites Undergoing Remedial Action.