Nevada Senate Bill SB384

Nevada 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/23
• Refer: 3/27/23
• Report Pass: 4/24/23
• Engrossed: 4/26/23
• Refer: 4/26/23
• Report Pass: 5/19/23
• Enrolled: 6/8/23
• Vetoed: 6/16/23

Caption

Establishes certain provisions relating to the award of grants of federal money by a state agency for the development of broadband services and infrastructure. (BDR 18-1035)

Impact

The legislation mandates that state agencies must evaluate grant applications based on certain criteria, and assign considerable weight to proposals that include certifications related to workforce training and safety. This requirement bolsters the emphasis on utilizing local and qualified labor, which is seen as a means to ensure public safety and improve job quality. Additionally, the bill includes provisions that exempt grant-funded projects from certain prevailing wage laws if involved parties are signatories to collective bargaining agreements, further influencing the labor landscape.

Summary

Senate Bill 384 aims to establish specific requirements for state agencies that award federal grants for the development of broadband services and infrastructure in Nevada. The bill focuses on ensuring that the allocation of these grants prioritizes applicants who can demonstrate the use of a well-trained workforce and the provision of quality jobs for residents. It recognizes the influx of federal funding from measures like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the American Rescue Plan Act as a unique opportunity to enhance broadband access throughout the state, particularly in underserved communities.

Contention

Debates surrounding SB384 highlighted concerns regarding its impact on labor regulations. While proponents argue that the bill's focus on safety and local employment is laudable, critics raise alarms about potentially undermining established wage standards in the construction industry. The focus on collective bargaining agreements may also polarize stakeholders, creating a divide among labor unions and contractors. These discussions reflect broader concerns about how regulatory changes could shape the dynamics of employment and infrastructure in Nevada.