Nevada Senate Bill SB384A

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Failed: 2/11/25

Caption

Establishes certain provisions relating to the award of grants of federal money by a state agency for the development of broadband services and infrastructure. (BDR 18-1035)

Impact

Under SB384A, state agencies that disburse federal grants for broadband infrastructure will have specific requirements to evaluate grant applications, assigning scores based on factors that prioritize workforce training and public safety. A key aspect of the bill is the emphasis on applicants providing a signed certification confirming their commitment to these standards, which can enhance the quality and safety of the projects undertaken. The legislation aims to create a sustainable model for broadband expansion that remains accountable and transparent in its execution.

Summary

Senate Bill 384A, sponsored by Senator Daly, establishes provisions for the allocation of federal funds aimed at enhancing broadband services across Nevada. The bill is positioned as a crucial legislative measure in light of significant incoming federal investments, particularly through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, designed to bridge the digital divide in underserved areas. The focus is to ensure that broadband development is not only extensive but also constructed through a well-trained workforce, emphasizing the protection and opportunities for local workers, especially those from underrepresented communities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB384A appears to be generally positive among supporters, including various state officials and organizations advocating for digital equity. They view the bill as a necessary progression towards improving connectivity and economic opportunities in rural areas. However, there is a cautious perspective regarding the enforcement of standards related to workforce training and safety, which some stakeholders believe could lead to additional regulatory burdens on smaller contractors and service providers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the provisions that exempt certain contractors from prevailing wage requirements if they are signatories of collective bargaining agreements. Some critics argue that this could lead to inequities, potentially favoring larger, unionized companies over smaller local firms. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the bill's implementation timeline and whether the infrastructure projects can begin swiftly enough to capitalize on the federal funding opportunities available. The debate represents broader discussions on how to effectively balance economic development, skilled labor engagement, and equitable access to digital resources.