Revises provisions relating to governmental entities. (BDR 20-936)
Impact
This bill has significant implications for how local governments can utilize audible signals associated with their jurisdictions. By prohibiting the sounding of alarms linked to past discriminatory practices, SB391 seeks to remove remnants of such oppressive practices from public life. Additionally, it introduces financial penalties of up to $50,000 for violations and grants the Attorney General the authority to initiate civil actions against non-compliant entities. This authority broadens the scope of state involvement in local governance concerning public safety and historical accountability.
Summary
Senate Bill No. 391, introduced by Senator D. Harris, is a legislative measure aimed at revising regulations related to the use of sirens, bells, or alarms by governmental entities such as counties, cities, and unincorporated towns in Nevada. The bill establishes specific prohibitions against sounding such alarms that were historically used in connection with ordinances that mandated certain discriminatory actions based on race or ethnicity. The revised law explicitly limits the purposes for which these alarms may be sounded, allowing only for emergencies, routine testing at specified intervals, or announcements associated with legal holidays.
Contention
Debates surrounding SB391 center on the balance between local control and state intervention. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards rectifying historical injustices and ensuring that municipalities do not perpetuate discriminatory practices through fear-based signaling. Conversely, opponents may contend that such measures could infringe on local governance and the autonomy of communities to manage their own emergency response protocols. The bill also includes provisions to protect those who report violations from facing adverse employment actions, addressing concerns about whistleblower protection in governmental operations.