Nevada Senate Bill SB476

Nevada 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/8/23
• Refer: 5/8/23
• Report Pass: 5/27/23
• Engrossed: 5/30/23
• Refer: 5/30/23
• Report Pass: 6/1/23
• Enrolled: 6/8/23
• Chaptered: 6/12/23
• Passed: 6/12/23

Caption

Makes appropriations to and authorizes the expenditure of money by the Office of the Military for facilities maintenance projects and the replacement or purchase of certain equipment and computer hardware and associated software. (BDR S-1187)

Impact

The bill entails a significant investment in the state's military infrastructure, which is vital for the operational efficiency of the Nevada National Guard. By endorsing this funding, the bill not only ensures necessary repairs and upgrades to facilities but also reinforces the state's strategic interests in maintaining adequate resources for emergency management and military engagement. The investments are intended to modernize equipment and technology necessary for the maintenance of facilities and enhance operational capabilities.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 476, introduced during the 82nd Session in 2023, aims to allocate funds for the maintenance of facilities used by the Office of the Military, including the Nevada National Guard. The bill specifies appropriations totaling approximately $1.2 million from the State General Fund, supplemented by additional expenditures not derived from state or highway funds, designated for similar purposes over the next two fiscal years. This allocation underscores the ongoing support for military operations and facilities in Nevada, reflecting state commitment to military readiness and infrastructure.

Contention

While the voting history indicates strong bipartisan support, with a unanimous vote in favor (42-0) during its final passage in the Assembly, the funding allocations can prompt discussions about resource prioritization. Critics may argue that appropriating such large sums to military facilities might divert funds from other crucial areas such as education or health services. This balance between military expenditure and social services is a point of potential contention as the state navigates budgetary challenges.