Provides an exemption from property taxation for accessory dwelling units rented or leased to certain tenants. (BDR 32-694)
The implementation of AB131 is expected to have significant implications on local housing regulations and policies. By permitting the addition of ADUs to historic properties, this bill aims to enhance housing supply in areas facing housing shortages. Local governing bodies will need to comply with the new requirements, which include establishing an expedited approval process for ADU applications while ensuring compliance with existing building and housing codes, thereby altering the local governance framework regarding housing development.
Assembly Bill 131 (AB131) aims to facilitate the addition of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) to historic residential properties in urban areas defined by certain population thresholds. It mandates that counties with populations of 100,000 or more and cities with populations of 60,000 or more adopt an ordinance to allow owners of eligible historic properties to apply for ADUs. The bill stipulates that these units are intended for family members or long-term rental use only, prohibiting transient lodging and certain forms of rental assistance such as Housing Choice Vouchers.
Sentiment around AB131 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill will help alleviate housing shortages and promote the preservation of historic properties by enabling flexibility in their usage. Critics, however, raise concerns about the broader implications for local governance and the potential for increased density in historically protected areas, which may conflict with community standards and resilience planning.
A notable point of contention surrounding AB131 lies in the balance between state policy and local control. Critics argue that while promoting ADUs may address housing issues, it could also undermine local authorities' ability to manage growth and maintain community character. Additionally, the restrictions placed on the use of these ADUs, especially the prohibitions on short-term rentals, have raised questions about property rights and economic opportunities for property owners.