Makes an appropriation for the development and carrying out of a certain internship program in psychology. (BDR S-615)
The implementation of AB330 is expected to enhance the training capacity for aspiring psychologists within Nevada. Currently, there is a significant gap in the number of licensed psychologists available to meet the state's mental health demands, especially for children and adolescents. The bill responds to a critical need highlighted by various reports, indicating that Nevada ranks poorly in mental health resources, with a concentration of only 12.2 licensed psychologists per 100,000 individuals compared to a national average of 32.8 per 100,000.
Assembly Bill 330 (AB330) aims to address the shortage of mental health professionals in Nevada, particularly in the area of child and adolescent psychology. By appropriating funds to the Partnership for Research, Assessment, Counseling, Therapy and Innovative Clinical Education at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, the bill facilitates the establishment of a predoctoral internship program. The funding amounts to $206,000 for the fiscal year 2025-2026 and $787,100 for the fiscal year 2026-2027, focusing on developing the necessary infrastructure to provide supervised training experiences that meet accreditation standards.
The sentiment around AB330 appears supportive among mental health advocates and educational institutions that recognize the necessity of bolstering the local workforce of psychologists. Given the dire statistics regarding mental health in Nevada, many stakeholders welcome the steps proposed in the bill as crucial for improving the mental health landscape and providing children and adolescents with the necessary care. However, concerns may still linger regarding the adequacy of the appropriated funds and whether they will be sufficient to achieve the program's objectives.
There may be contention regarding the allocation of state funds to this initiative amid other pressing needs within the state. While supporters of AB330 argue for its necessity in freeing Nevada from its status as a mental health professional shortage area, critics may emphasize the importance of ensuring that the funds are utilized effectively and efficiently to establish a sustainable program. Additionally, questions regarding the long-term commitment to mental health care and the continuity of funding post-implementation may arise in discussions surrounding the bill.