Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Nevada Senate Bill SB261

Introduced
3/3/25  
Refer
3/3/25  

Caption

Revises provisions relating to housing. (BDR 3-581)

Impact

The bill significantly alters the existing legal framework governing forcible entry and detainer, which previously required lengthy judicial involvement before an eviction could occur. By enabling property owners to directly contact law enforcement for removals under specific conditions, SB261 aims to reduce the burden of recovering properties on owners. The inclusion of a standardized form helps provide clarity and uniformity in the reporting process, potentially speeding up resolutions in unlawful occupancy cases. However, the amendments also create new penalties, including felony charges for perjury if false statements are made on the form.

Summary

Senate Bill 261 revises existing provisions related to housing by establishing new procedures for removing unlawful or unauthorized occupants from a dwelling. The bill allows property owners or their authorized representatives to submit a written complaint to request that a sheriff remove an occupant who forcibly entered or is unlawfully detaining the property. This is intended to expedite the eviction process in situations where the unlawful occupant is not a tenant or family member, nor involved in any ongoing litigation concerning the property. The bill also mandates the development of a form for reporting such incidents to streamline procedures between law enforcement and property owners.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB261 is mixed. Proponents argue that it will provide essential protections for property owners against unlawful occupants, emphasizing that it streamlines the eviction process and remedies long-standing issues related to tenant rights versus property rights. Critics, however, worry that the bill may undermine tenant protections and create a situation where landlords can forcibly remove occupants without proper judicial oversight, potentially leading to abuses or wrongful evictions without sufficient due process for those residing in the properties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the potential for misuse of the expedited eviction process. Opponents of the bill argue it lacks adequate safeguards for tenants, who may be wrongfully evicted without proper legal recourse. Lawmakers and advocacy groups on the opposing side have raised alarms about the implications of allowing sheriffs to enforce property removal based merely on a submitted complaint. The discussion highlights a delicate balance between enhancing landlord rights and protecting tenants from immediate eviction.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A4250

Establishes expedited ejectment proceeding to remove certain unauthorized real property occupants.

SC H3418

Removal of unauthorized perons

SC S0239

Request to Remove Unlawful Resident

HI HB709

Relating To Trespassing.

TN SB0292

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 29 and Title 66, relative to real property.

TN HB0216

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 29 and Title 66, relative to real property.

MN SF558

Owners of residential real property remedy of removal of unauthorized persons provision

FL H0213

Property Rights