Nevada Senate Bill SB489

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Report Pass: 5/20/25
• Engrossed: 5/23/25
• Refer: 5/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Enrolled: 6/4/25
• Chaptered: 6/6/25
• Passed: 6/6/25

Caption

Makes appropriations to the Department of Corrections for the purchase and replacement of certain equipment and furniture. (BDR S-1207)

Impact

The legislative discussions around SB489 indicate that it is part of a broader push to enhance the living conditions and operational efficiency within transitional housing for individuals re-entering from correctional facilities. By providing these funds, the bill seeks to improve both the physical environment and the services offered, which could lead to better outcomes for residents. The bill's financial provisions are intended to ensure that the facilities have adequate resources to maintain and update essential equipment and furnishings, ultimately aiming to support the reintegration process for former inmates.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 489 aims to make appropriations to the Department of Corrections specifically for the purchase and replacement of equipment and furniture at certain transitional housing facilities. This bill outlines financial allocations for two fiscal years, 2025-2026 and 2026-2027, with specific amounts designated for small equipment and replacement items at the Northern Nevada and Casa Grande Transitional Housing facilities. The total appropriations amount to $1,660 for small equipment, $8,228 for maintenance equipment, and $12,312 for sunshade canopies and office chairs at the transitional housing locations.

Contention

While specific points of contention were not detailed in the available discussion snippets, bills like SB489 often face scrutiny regarding budget allocations, especially in the context of limited state financial resources. Some legislators may raise concerns about the prioritization of funding for corrections facilities over other critical areas such as public education or healthcare. The clear specification of budget timelines and the requirement that unspent funds revert to the state general fund could also be points of debate among lawmakers who wish to ensure responsible fiscal management.