Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Nevada Senate Bill SB62

Refer
11/20/24  
Introduced
2/3/25  
Report Pass
4/18/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
5/27/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
5/28/25  
Report Pass
5/30/25  
Refer
5/30/25  
Report Pass
6/1/25  
Enrolled
6/5/25  
Chaptered
6/9/25  

Caption

Revises provisions relating to crimes. (BDR 16-507)

Impact

The implications of SB62 on state laws are significant as it directly modifies the definitions and provisions related to victim compensation. Notably, the amendments to the definition of 'victim' will now encompass individuals who may face bias in crime due to perceived personal characteristics. This change positions the state to more effectively support victims of hate crimes and vulnerable populations, ultimately leading toward a more inclusive approach to justice and crime victim compensation. The proposed financial appropriations included in the bill further reinforce the state's commitment to addressing these critical issues.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 62, introduced in the 83rd Session (2025), seeks to amend existing laws related to victim compensation by expanding the definition of 'victim' under the Fund for the Compensation of Victims of Crime in Nevada. The bill stipulates that individuals targeted due to certain perceived characteristics will now qualify for compensation from the fund, which aims to address the growing concerns of hate crimes and discrimination. Furthermore, it allows such victims to receive compensation of up to $1,000 for property remediation that has been damaged during the commission of the crime against them, enhancing the support framework for these individuals.

Contention

However, the bill is not without points of contention. Critics may argue that expanding the definition and compensation for victims could lead to burdens on the state budget, especially with the appropriations set at $30,000 for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 for the fund. Some opponents could raise concerns regarding the potential for the bill to incentivize claims or the complexity of managing expanded eligibility criteria. Proponents, on the other hand, argue that it's essential to recognize the unique challenges faced by victims of hate crimes and to provide the resources necessary for their recovery and remediation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.