Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Nevada Senate Bill SB76

Refer
11/20/24  
Introduced
2/3/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
5/26/25  
Engrossed
5/27/25  
Refer
5/27/25  
Report Pass
5/30/25  

Caption

Revises provisions relating to securities. (BDR 7-486)

Impact

The passage of SB76 is expected to have a meaningful impact on state laws regarding securities and victims' rights. It establishes a structured approach for victims to obtain financial relief when restitution orders are not fulfilled by the offenders. In addition to enhancing victim support, the legislation will require the Securities Division of the Office of the Secretary of State to create regulations for administering the fund, which could lead to a more responsive and proactive legal environment for addressing securities fraud in Nevada.

Summary

Senate Bill 76 addresses the issue of securities fraud by creating the Fund for the Compensation of Victims of Securities Fraud. This fund will provide a mechanism for victims who are owed restitution by the courts to receive compensation if their restitution is not paid. The bill specifies the eligibility requirements, application process, and confidentiality measures to protect applicants' information while they seek compensation. The introduction of this fund is a significant move to aid individuals who have suffered financial losses due to fraudulent practices within the securities market in Nevada.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB76 has generally been positive among advocacy groups and lawmakers focused on consumer protection, as it symbolizes a commitment to combating securities fraud and providing resources for victims. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the management and sustainability of the fund, particularly in ensuring that it remains adequately financed to serve its purpose over time.

Contention

Some of the notable points of contention highlighted during discussions include the fund's initial funding sources and the procedures for determining eligibility and compensation. Critics express concern over the potential for bureaucratic delays in processing claims and the overall effectiveness of the fund if it does not secure enough revenue to meet the anticipated demand from victims seeking compensation. Furthermore, questions arose regarding how this bill would affect existing laws governing securities and if it might unintentionally create additional bureaucracy for the Securities Division.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

FL H0311

Securities

OK SB1361

Securities; modifying certain exemptions; requiring certain notice filings; updating statutory references. Effective date.

FL S0988

Securities

MS HB1153

Digital assets; authorize security interests in.

KS HB2152

Substitute for HB 2152 by Committee on Financial Institutions and Pensions - Mandating financial institutions to secure governmental unit deposits in excess of the amount insured or guaranteed by the FDIC by utilizing a public moneys pooled method of securities, prohibiting investment advisers that execute bids for the investment of public moneys from managing moneys directly from such bid, allowing governmental unit deposits to be invested at a rate agreed upon by the governmental unit and the financial institution, requiring certification from a governmental unit that deposits in the municipal investment pool fund were first offered to a financial institution in the preceding year and allowing financial institutions to file complaints upon the failure to comply.

OR HB2274

Relating to securities regulation; and prescribing an effective date.

MS HB849

Securities laws; provide certain exemptions regarding blockchain tokens.

MS HB1154

Securities laws; provide certain exemptions regarding blockchain tokens.