New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A04641

Introduced
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
3/4/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
6/12/25  

Caption

Relates to rechargeable battery recycling; adds a battery used as the principal electric power source for an electric scooter or bicycle with electric assist to the definition of "rechargeable battery"; provides that a battery manufacturer may not sell, offer for sale, or distribute rechargeable batteries in the state unless the battery manufacturer is implementing or participating under an approved plan; allows a city with a population of one million or more to enforce through its own agencies.

Impact

The bill enhances existing regulations by ensuring responsible collection, transportation, and recycling of rechargeable batteries, which has implications for the management of solid waste in New York. Retailers are legally required to accept worn-out batteries from consumers, and those that do not comply can face penalties. Additionally, local authorities, particularly in cities with large populations (over a million), gain enforcement powers, thereby elevating local governance in waste management matters. This is a significant shift as it encourages municipal involvement in environmental duties, enhancing overall compliance with recycling laws.

Summary

Bill A04641 aims to amend New York's Environmental Conservation Law concerning the recycling of rechargeable batteries. This bill specifically includes batteries used as the primary power source for electric scooters and bicycles with electric assist in the definition of 'rechargeable batteries'. Furthermore, it mandates that battery manufacturers must implement an approved recycling plan before selling their products within the state, thus increasing accountability for battery disposal. The emphasis on a structured recycling plan aims to enhance sustainability and reduce environmental impact from waste batteries.

Contention

Points of contention include potential disagreements regarding the enforcement authority provided to large cities versus state-level controls. Critics may argue that this could lead to a complex regulatory environment depending on local interpretations of compliance. Furthermore, concerns about the economic impact on battery manufacturers and retailers could arise, particularly regarding the costs of implementing the required recycling programs. The bill's preemption clause ensures that once enacted, local regulations cannot exceed state standards in this area, which may be seen as limiting local governance and adaptability.

Companion Bills

NY S00073

Same As Relates to rechargeable battery recycling; adds a battery used as the principal electric power source for an electric scooter or bicycle with electric assist to the definition of "rechargeable battery"; provides that a battery manufacturer may not sell, offer for sale, or distribute rechargeable batteries in the state unless the battery manufacturer is implementing or participating under an approved plan; allows a city with a population of one million or more to enforce through its own agencies.

Similar Bills

CA AB1151

Fire damages: civil actions: pecuniary damages and ecological and environmental damages.

CA SB680

Well stimulation.

CA AB2323

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions.

CA AB732

Delta levee maintenance.

CA AB819

California Environmental Quality Act: notices and documents: electronic filing and posting.

CA AB1648

Housing: school employees: affordable rental housing.

CA AB1649

Oil refineries: public safety.

CA AB1001

Environment: mitigation measures for air quality impacts: environmental justice.