New York Assembly Bill A08069

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/24/25
• Refer: 4/24/25
• Report Pass: 4/29/25
• Refer: 4/29/25
• Report Pass: 5/22/25
• Refer: 5/22/25
• Report Pass: 5/27/25
• Engrossed: 5/27/25
• Refer: 5/27/25
• Engrossed: 6/10/25
• Enrolled: 6/18/25
• Chaptered: 6/20/25
• Chaptered: 6/18/25
• Passed: 6/20/25
• Passed: 6/18/25

Caption

Extends provisions of law relating to the acquisition and disposition of real property by the metropolitan transportation authority.

Impact

By extending the effectiveness of the provisions related to the MTA's real property acquisitions, A08069 aims to provide legislative support for the ongoing transportation initiatives planned by the MTA. The bill is structured to ensure that current and future condemnation proceedings are unaffected until June 24, 2028. This statutory support is essential for maintaining momentum in infrastructure projects and ensuring the MTA can operate effectively in securing locations for operations, upgrades, and expansions of services.

Summary

Bill A08069 seeks to extend the provisions concerning the acquisition and disposition of real property by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). The bill is a subsequent amendment that addresses previous legislation enabling the MTA to acquire real estate necessary for transportation-related projects. The aim is to ensure that the MTA continues to have the necessary authority to obtain properties, which may be crucial for the expansion and maintenance of public transport infrastructure in New York State.

Contention

Discussions surrounding A08069 may include points of contention regarding the balance between the MTA's need for property acquisitions and the rights and impacts on local communities. The potential for displacement due to condemnation and acquisition of properties could raise concerns among residents. Moreover, stakeholders may debate the necessity of extending these provisions, particularly evaluating how effectively the MTA has utilized the authority in previous years and whether the extensions serve the public's best interest without infringing on local governance.