New York Assembly Bill A08982

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/13/25
• Refer: 8/13/25

Caption

Requires a residential transition conference when a person with developmental disabilities transfers from one program run by a covered operator to another program run by a covered operator; defines terms; specifies certain persons who shall attend such conference; requires covered operators to complete a form summarizing such conference and to file the form with the office for people with developmental disabilities.

Impact

If enacted, A08982 will expand the requirements of covered operators, who are organizations providing residential services. They will be obligated to participate actively in these transition conferences, which involves reviewing and discussing the individualized service plans of the individuals affected. The requisite documentation will enhance accountability and communication between service providers, allowing for tailored support that aligns with the individual’s needs and preferences. The potential impact on state laws includes the formalization of procedures regarding the transfer of individuals in care, reflecting a commitment to person-centered practices.

Summary

Bill A08982 seeks to amend the mental hygiene law by mandating a residential transition conference for individuals with developmental disabilities who are transferring between residential programs run by covered operators. This bill emphasizes the importance of coordinated transitions by requiring attendance from key stakeholders, including the current and future service providers, the individual with developmental disabilities, their family members, guardians, and care managers. The conference is designed to ensure continuity in care and support for the affected individuals during their transition, helping to facilitate a smoother adjustment to new environments.

Contention

Some points of contention surrounding Bill A08982 might involve concerns about the logistical implications of implementing mandated conferences for every transition between programs. Critics may argue that this could pose challenges for service providers regarding resource allocation and scheduling, potentially leading to delays or impediments in the transitions themselves. Moreover, there is a discussion about the adequacy of representation for individuals with developmental disabilities during these conferences and whether their voices are sufficiently prioritized amid family and provider discussions, which could affect the overall effectiveness of the intended support.