New York Assembly Bill A09017

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/5/25
• Refer: 9/5/25
• Refer: 11/5/25
• Refer: 1/7/26
• Refer: 1/30/26

Caption

Requires vacancies in the office of lieutenant-governor to be filled within certain timeframes and procedures.

Impact

The impact of A09017 on state law is significant as it establishes a clear timeline and procedure for the governor's nominations. By enforcing these timeframes, the bill seeks to eliminate ambiguity associated with vacancy appointments, thereby promoting a more efficient governance system. Additionally, the procedure for what happens if the legislature rejects a nomination is detailed; the governor is given the opportunity to propose another candidate within thirty days of rejection, thus maintaining the continuity of leadership.

Summary

Bill A09017 seeks to amend Article 4 of the New York Constitution regarding the process of filling vacancies in the office of lieutenant-governor. The proposed changes dictate that the governor must nominate a candidate within sixty days of the vacancy's creation, and that nominee must then be confirmed by a majority vote in both houses of the legislature within another sixty days. This proposal aims to streamline the process for filling such vacancies and to ensure there is a prompt response to changes in the state's executive leadership.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. Critics may argue that imposing strict timelines could pressure the governor into making hasty nominations, potentially compromising the selection process's thoroughness. Furthermore, if the legislature is unable to act within the stipulated timelines, provisions in the bill allow for legislative intervention to fill the vacancy, which could be seen as undermining the governor's authority.

Additional-notes

The bill addresses procedural clarity and is likely to be subject to debate regarding the merit of such amendments in enhancing executive effectiveness against perceived risks of political maneuvering during appointments.