Ohio 2023-2024 Regular Session

Ohio House Bill HB34

Introduced
2/15/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Engrossed
6/27/23  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Passed
4/23/24  

Caption

Excuse breast-feeding mothers from jury service

Impact

The impact of HB34 on state laws revolves around modifications to the criteria under which potential jurors may be excused from jury service. The bill specifically allows for the inclusion of breastfeeding mothers as a category eligible for exemption based on 'undue or extreme physical or financial hardship'. This change represents a step toward accommodating the unique challenges faced by mothers in the legal system, thereby promoting inclusivity within jury service obligations.

Summary

House Bill 34 aims to amend existing jury service laws in the state of Ohio to exempt mothers who are breastfeeding from being called for jury duty. This legislation highlights the balance between civic responsibilities and the needs of mothers who are nursing, recognizing that attending jury service can be a significant burden during this critical period of child care. By allowing this exemption, the bill seeks to provide necessary support for mothers, ensuring that they can adequately care for their infants without the added stress of mandatory jury participation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB34 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for women's rights and health, who see it as a necessary acknowledgment of the demands of motherhood. There is recognition that such legislative measures can alleviate pressures on breastfeeding mothers and support their ability to balance civic duties with family responsibilities. However, there may also be some arguments against it related to concerns about fairness and the potential for misuse of exemption provisions, albeit these points seem less prominent in discussion.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB34 may involve discussions on what constitutes 'undue or extreme hardship' and the criteria for documentation required to support an exemption request. Critics could argue that exemptions might encourage some potential jurors to claim hardship without valid reason, while supporters emphasize the importance of supporting mothers who genuinely face difficulties in fulfilling both their legal obligations and their family roles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1695

Health facilities.

CA AB1899

Courts.

CA AB299

Hiring of real property: immigration or citizenship status.

CA AB1541

Examination of prospective jurors.

CA SB576

Jury commissioners: juror data collections and maintenance.

CA AB1736

Notification requirements.

NJ A645

Exempts judges and justices from jury duty.

NJ A615

Exempts judges and justices from jury duty.