Ohio 2023-2024 Regular Session

Ohio House Bill HB49

Introduced
2/15/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Engrossed
6/27/23  
Report Pass
6/12/24  

Caption

Regards availability of hospital price information

Impact

The proposed legislation will significantly alter the way hospitals in Ohio interact with consumers regarding pricing. It requires hospitals to create detailed and accessible records of their pricing structures, thus promoting greater competition and potentially lowering costs through consumer awareness. This shift is expected to foster an environment where consumers can make better-informed decisions about their healthcare services, ultimately leading to cost efficiencies within the healthcare system. The bill also establishes penalties for hospitals that fail to comply, ensuring that there are repercussions for non-compliance.

Summary

House Bill 49 aims to enhance transparency in hospital pricing by requiring hospitals to publicly disclose their standard charges for various services, particularly those that consumers can schedule in advance, referred to as 'shoppable services.' The bill specifies that each hospital must maintain a publicly accessible list of the prices for items and services it provides, detailing both the highest and lowest negotiated charges for each service alongside the gross charge. By mandating digital accessibility and clear labeling, the bill strives to empower consumers and improve their ability to compare healthcare costs effectively.

Sentiment

Support for HB 49 stems primarily from consumer advocacy groups and some legislators who argue that increased transparency will benefit patients by allowing them to shop around for the best prices. They believe the bill will address issues related to surprise billing and lack of price clarity in healthcare. However, there are concerns from hospital associations who argue that simply posting prices may not account for the complexities of healthcare billing and can mislead consumers about actual costs, particularly when insurance coverage and patient-specific factors come into play.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 49 include debates over the complexity and practicality of implementing such extensive pricing transparency. Opponents have raised concerns that the bill may not effectively address the causes of high healthcare costs if it does not take into account the nuances of insurance negotiations and the variations in costs associated with different patient care situations. Additionally, there is apprehension about the potential burden on smaller hospitals that may struggle to meet the technical demands of maintaining digital transparency as outlined in the legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S1984

Requires DOH to evaluate hospital compliance with federal hospital price transparency requirements.

NJ S4254

Requires hospitals to publish list of standard charges for certain items and services.

WI SB328

Price transparency in hospitals and providing a penalty. (FE)

WI AB338

Price transparency in hospitals and providing a penalty. (FE)

TX SB1137

Relating to the required disclosure of prices for certain items and services provided by certain medical facilities; providing administrative penalties.

TX HB2487

Relating to the required disclosure by hospitals of prices for hospital services and items; providing administrative penalties.

TX SB914

Relating to the required disclosure by hospitals of prices for hospital services and items; providing administrative penalties.

MT HB689

Provide for pricing transparency requirements for hospitals