Ohio Senate Bill SB162

Ohio 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/27/23
• Report Pass: 12/13/23
• Engrossed: 12/13/23

Caption

Regards academic intervention services

Impact

If enacted, SB162 will significantly affect the operation of community schools by formalizing requirements for academic intervention services and ensuring that data regarding educational performance is uniformly collected and reported to the Ohio Department of Education. This change is aimed at refining the accountability measures in place, making it easier for the state to monitor performance across various educational institutions. The amendments proposed will require sponsors to implement annual evaluations and report findings, which may lead to a more standardized approach to educational oversight in Ohio.

Summary

Senate Bill 162 aims to enhance academic intervention services across public schools in Ohio, specifically targeting the establishment of mathematics improvement and intervention plans. This legislation introduces new sections to the Ohio Revised Code while amending existing law. The core goal is to improve student academic performance through structured interventions and to ensure community schools adhere to effective operational standards. The bill also regulates the oversight and monitoring responsibilities of school sponsors, establishing clearer protocols for academic and fiscal performance evaluations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB162 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters. Advocates believe the bill will bolster academic standards and accountability, particularly in math education, which many view as critical amidst ongoing educational challenges. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential bureaucratic burden this legislation might impose on community schools and their operational flexibility. The debate reflects broader tensions in the education sector over the balance between institutional accountability and educational autonomy.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates about the level of oversight and intervention state authorities should have in community schools. Opponents argue that increased oversight could stifle innovation and adaptiveness within schools. Additionally, questions have been raised about how new data verification requirements may impact smaller schools or those struggling to implement standard practices. Thus, the bill encapsulates a conflict between enhancing educational quality through regulation and maintaining flexibility for educational institutions to meet local needs.