Ohio 2025-2026 Regular Session

Ohio House Bill HB241

Caption

Regards dog quarantine, disposition hearing, after a dog attack

Impact

This bill seeks to amend existing laws in Ohio regarding dangerous dogs and the procedures following dog attacks. The new provisions aim to ensure public safety while also considering the well-being of the dog involved. By implementing a formal investigation process after attacks, the bill introduces a measure of accountability for both dog owners and local authorities. Courts will have a clarified role in determining the disposition of the dog, aligning the law with best practices for handling potentially dangerous animals.

Summary

House Bill 241 addresses concerns related to dog attacks by establishing a required quarantine period for dogs following an incident where they injure or kill a person. The bill mandates that a 10-day quarantine occurs after such attacks, during which an investigation will be conducted to assess the dog's behavior and situation. Based on the findings of this investigation, the dog may be allowed to return to its owner without conditions, be released with mandatory training and rehabilitation, or be humanely destroyed if deemed necessary for safety reasons.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 241 appears to be supportive, especially from those advocating for public safety and responsible dog ownership. Proponents argue that this bill provides a necessary framework to assess and respond to dangerous dog incidents, ensuring that dogs are treated humanely while minimizing risks to the community. However, there may also be concerns from some dog owners about the implications of stringent regulations and the potential for drastic measures, like euthanasia, to be applied.

Contention

Points of contention may arise around the balance between public safety and the rights of dog owners. Some may argue that the provisions for rehabilitation and training may not always be adequate or feasible, leading to discussions about the best approaches to animal behavior. Additionally, the enforcement of court orders concerning dog training and quarantine could introduce debates regarding the responsibility of dog owners to ensure compliance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OH HB539

Revise the law governing high volume dog breeders

OH HB557

Regards school directory information and public records

OH HB44

Require electronic recordings of parole board hearings

OH HB647

Require transfer of funds from county's dog and kennel fund

OH HB305

Regards electronic filing of court documents; computerization

OH SB29

Regards education records and student data privacy

OH SB196

Regards authority of advanced practice registered nurses

OH SB16

Regards immunity from liability for donations of perishable food

OH HB80

Regards pharmacist care

OH SB122

Revise the law regarding bail

Similar Bills

CA AB1198

Public works: prevailing wages.

AZ SB1523

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ SB1042

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ HB2507

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ SB1018

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ HB2688

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ SB1636

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ HB2148

School districts; expenditure limitation