Ohio House Bill HB66

Ohio 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/25

Caption

Repeal H.B. 6 - 133rd GA legacy generation resource provisions

Impact

The implications of HB 66 are significant as it addresses the financial operations of electric utilities in Ohio, particularly concerning how they recover costs associated with older generation resources. By repealing existing provisions, it aims to create a more equitable financial structure that does not place undue financial burdens on consumers. The new regulations will essentially restrict how utilities manage and recover costs associated with legacy generation items, potentially leading to lower bills for customers who have been financially impacted by these legacy commitments.

Summary

House Bill 66 aims to repeal the legacy generation resource provisions established by H.B. 6 of the 133rd General Assembly in Ohio. This legislation modifies section 4928.01 of the Revised Code and specifically targets provisions that allowed for the collection of certain costs associated with legacy generation resources. Additionally, the bill mandates the refund of collected revenues to customers who were affected by these provisions, ensuring that they receive a financial restitution from the electric utilities involved. This move is seen as an attempt to rectify financial burdens placed on consumers due to policies established in prior legislation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 66 appears to be largely positive among consumer advocacy groups and legislators who support consumer rights. They view the repeal as a necessary step toward enhancing the fairness and transparency of the energy market in Ohio. However, electric utilities and some stakeholders may express concerns regarding the financial strains this repeal could impose on their operations, leading to a polarized view between consumer advocates and utility companies.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate over the potential financial impact on electric utilities. Opponents of the bill argue that repealing these provisions may undermine the financial stability of utilities that rely on these cost recoveries to operate effectively. This could lead to increased scrutiny over their financial structure and potentially high tension as the bill aims to balance consumer refund needs with utility fiscal responsibilities.