Require DAS conduct a study of the state's real property holdings
The implementation of HB 85 is anticipated to significantly improve transparency and accountability in the management of state property. By requiring a systematic review, the bill aims to provide insights into how effectively state properties are serving their intended purposes. This might lead to better allocation of resources, potential sales of underutilized properties, or adjustments in leasing strategies to optimize expenses. Moreover, it provides legislative leaders with a clearer picture of state asset management, potentially influencing future budgeting and property acquisition decisions.
House Bill 85 aims to enact section 123.14 of the Revised Code in Ohio, requiring the Department of Administrative Services to conduct a comprehensive study every two years of all real property holdings owned or leased by the state or its agencies. The bill stipulates the information to be included in the study, which encompasses a detailed list of real estate, its usage, maintenance costs, and whether the properties are utilized fully by state employees or remain unused. The objective is to gather thorough data to inform policy decisions regarding state property management.
Overall sentiment surrounding HB 85 appears to be positive, with legislators recognizing the potential benefits of enhanced oversight of state properties. Advocates for the bill argue that it promotes efficiency and could lead to cost savings for the state. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders regarding the administrative burden this requirement could impose on the Department of Administrative Services, as well as whether it will effectively translate into actionable policy changes.
Despite the general support for the aims of HB 85, notable contention may arise regarding the potential implications of the findings from the comprehensive studies. Critics might express concerns about how the data collected could be used, particularly if it leads to decisions about selling off state properties or reducing allocations to specific agencies. Additionally, there may be debates over the definitions used in the bill regarding what constitutes 'state agency' and the parameters for the study, ensuring it encompasses all relevant entities without excluding essential data.