Ohio 2025-2026 Regular Session

Ohio Senate Bill SB106

Caption

Regulate the ownership of electric vehicle charging stations

Impact

The bill aims to impact existing laws regarding public utilities, specifically steering rules around how electric distribution utilities can own and operate charging stations. It would mandate that these utilities must work through separate affiliates to ensure that the stations operate outside of traditional public utility regulations unless certain conditions are met. This has significant implications for the market dynamics of electric vehicle charging, potentially increasing competition and availability in underserved areas.

Summary

Senate Bill 106, proposed by Senator Reineke, seeks to regulate the ownership and operation of electric vehicle charging stations within Ohio. The bill proposes amendments to the Revised Code, enacting new sections that define important terms related to electric vehicles and charging stations, as well as stipulating the responsibilities and operational structures for electric distribution utilities. Notably, it creates definitions for 'direct current fast charging stations', 'level two charging stations', and outlines criteria for establishing publicly available charging stations in 'areas of last resort.' This aims to enhance access to charging infrastructure, particularly in less populated areas.

Sentiment

Discussions around SB106 suggest a generally supportive sentiment among legislators focused on promoting electric vehicle use and providing adequate infrastructure. However, there remain concerns from certain stakeholders about the implications of utilities' involvement and the bill's potential to favor large utilities over smaller, independent charging providers. This friction indicates a divided opinion on the best pathway to promote electric vehicle adoption in Ohio.

Contention

Key points of contention include the provision that requires electric distribution utilities to demonstrate a lack of charging stations in an area of last resort before being approved for installation. Critics argue that this could slow down the expansion of necessary infrastructure, especially in rural regions where immediate deployment is crucial. Additionally, the limitations on utility charging rates and conditions under which they can operate raise concerns about the balance of market competition, innovation, and consumer protections.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB698

California Solar Initiative: distributed energy resource equipment lists.

CA SB256

Electricity: electrical infrastructure: wildfire mitigation: undergrounding: emergency operations.

IL SB1920

SCH CD-ASL IMPLEMENTATION

PA HB749

In public assistance, providing for distribution of SNAP benefits.

IL SB1783

STOP GOVERNMENT SEX SHOWS ACT

CA SB292

Electricity: wildfire mitigation: deenergization events and undergrounding plans.

CA AB1251

Job postings.

ME LD1359

Resolve, to Direct the Department of Transportation to Develop Practices Regarding Public Transit