Personal identification information; making certain acts unlawful; authorizing elected county officials and peace officers to request the confidentiality of personal information; effective date.
Impact
This legislation amends existing statutes related to personal information confidentiality, allowing elected officials and peace officers to request that their personal information be kept confidential and not made publicly available online. This change is significant as it provides a higher level of protection for those in public service, particularly in light of growing concerns over doxxing and online harassment. The bill's implementation emphasizes the importance of balancing transparency in government with the safety of public servants.
Summary
House Bill 1643 aims to enhance the protection of personal identification information regarding elected county officials and peace officers in Oklahoma. The bill prohibits the unlawful use of electronic communication to publish or disseminate personally identifiable information with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or harass these officials. By establishing penalties for violations, the bill seeks to safeguard the privacy and safety of individuals in these roles, recognizing their public service as a potential target for threats and harassment in an increasingly digital world.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1643 appears to be predominantly supportive among those who believe in the necessity of protecting the identities of peace officers and public officials. Proponents argue that the bill is a crucial step toward ensuring safety for those who serve the community, particularly in a climate where online harassment has become prevalent. Conversely, some voices may raise concerns about the implications for transparency and public access to government records, highlighting a potential conflict between privacy and public accountability.
Contention
While there is broad agreement on the need for increased protection for public officials, potential points of contention may arise regarding the enforcement of the bill and how broadly the definitions of 'personally identifiable information' and 'harassment' will be interpreted. Additionally, discussions about the balance between confidentiality and public transparency could lead to debates about whether further implications might arise regarding public access to records and the ability of citizens to engage with their lawmakers.
Protection from domestic abuse; personal information confidential; Attorney General; Address Confidentiality Program to request certain information to not be made public; effective date; emergency.
Crimes and punishments; display of harmful materials; trespass with respect to critical infrastructure facilities; criminal liability for loitering in certain places. Effective date.
To Amend The Freedom Of Information Act Of 1967; And To Exempt Personal Information Of Elected Constitutional Officers, Judicial Officials, Elected County Officials, Elected Municipal Officials, And Their Immediate Family.