Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB2449 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 01/21/2021

                             
 
Req. No. 6683 	Page 1  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 
 
1st Session of the 58th Legislature (2021) 
 
HOUSE BILL 2449 	By: Virgin 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AS INTRODUCED 
 
An Act relating to children; stating findings of the 
Legislature regarding differences between juvenile 
and adult offenders; providing l egislative intent; 
defining term; directing courts to consider 
differences between juvenile and adult offenders; 
authorizing courts to reduce mandatory minimum 
sentencing requirement by certain percentage; 
authorizing courts to depart from certain sentenci ng 
enhancements; providing for codification; providing 
for noncodification; and providing an effective date. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 
SECTION 1.     NEW LAW     A new section of law not to be 
codified in the Oklahoma Statutes reads as follows: 
A.  The Legislature finds that children are different from 
adults and that these differences must be taken into account when 
children are sentenced for adult crimes. 
B.  As stated by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. 
Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), "only a relatively small proportion of   
 
Req. No. 6683 	Page 2  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
adolescents" who engage in illegal activity "develop entrenched 
patterns of problem behavior ". Id., at 570. 
C.  Children are more vulnerable to negative influences and 
outside pressures, including from their family and peers, and they 
have limited control over their own environment and lack the ability 
to extricate themselves from horrific, crime -producing settings. 
D.  The United States Supreme Court has emphasized thr ough cases 
such as Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), Graham v. Florida, 
560 U.S. 48 (2010), Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) , and 
Montgomery v. Louisiana , 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016) that "the distinctive 
attributes of youth diminish the penological j ustifications for 
imposing the harshest sentences on juvenile offenders, even w hen 
they commit terrible crimes ". 
E.  The Legislature further finds that there is a recent trend 
in the United States of giving greater discretion to judges when 
sentencing children, including departing from mandatory minimum 
sentences in appropriate cases. 
F.  Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to allow 
courts to depart up to thirty -five percent (35%) from any applicable 
mandatory minimum sentence when sentencing chi ldren, as well as any 
applicable mandatory sentencing enhancements, if the court believes 
such a reduction is warranted given the young age of the child and 
the prospects for rehabilitation.   
 
Req. No. 6683 	Page 3  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
SECTION 2.     NEW LAW     A new section of law t o be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 2 -5-401 of Title 10A, unless 
there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  As used in this section, "mandatory minimum" means the 
minimum number of years of imprisonment a person is req uired to 
serve based on the felony or misdemeanor offense. 
B.  If a person is convicted as an adult for an offense that the 
person committed when he or she was under eighteen (18) years of 
age, in addition to any other factors that the court is required to 
consider before imposing a sentence upon that person, the court 
shall consider the differences between juvenile and adult offenders, 
including without limitation the diminished culpability of juveniles 
as compared to that of adults and the typical charact eristics of 
youth. 
C.  After considering the factors set forth in subsection B of 
this section, the court may reduce any mandatory minimum period of 
incarceration that the person is required to serve by not more than 
thirty-five percent (35%) if the court determines that a reduction 
in the sentence is warranted given the age of the person and his or 
her prospects for rehabilitation. 
D.  Before the imposition of a sentence for a person who was 
under eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the offense and 
after consideration of the factors in subsection B of this section,   
 
Req. No. 6683 	Page 4  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
the court may depart from any minimum mandatory sentencing 
enhancement that the court would otherwise be required to impose. 
SECTION 3.  This act shall become effective Nove mber 1, 2021. 
 
58-1-6683 CMA 12/21/20