Oklahoma House Bill HB2750

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 2/22/21
• Engrossed: 3/4/21
• Refer: 3/15/21
• Report Pass: 3/30/21
• Enrolled: 4/22/21
• Passed: 4/28/21

Caption

Schools; declaring legislative intent; effective date; emergency.

Impact

The legislation mandates that educational institutions adhere to specific guidelines concerning the acceptance of Advanced Placement (AP) examination scores. It stipulates that institutions cannot require a score higher than three for credit for lower division courses, aiming to standardize the criteria across the higher education system. This move is expected to facilitate students' transitions and reduce barriers to receiving credit for previous coursework, therefore potentially impacting retention and graduation rates positively.

Summary

House Bill 2750 aims to enhance the transferability of academic credits among institutions within The Oklahoma State System of Higher Education. The bill emphasizes that credits earned at one institution should be fully accepted by another, fostering a seamless educational experience for students. It outlines that any representation made by educational institutions regarding credit transfer must be backed by written agreements, ensuring transparency and accountability in the process.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB2750 appears to be supportive, especially from educational advocates and institutions that prioritize student mobility and success. Legislators involved in the sponsorship of the bill conveyed intentions to improve the educational system in Oklahoma. However, there might be concerns regarding how effectively the bill will be implemented and monitored, particularly in ensuring compliance among various institutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention might arise around the enforcement of the new policies and the potential administrative burden placed on institutions to comply with the reporting obligations. The requirement for biennial reviews and compliance reports could be seen as a challenge for some institutions, raising questions about resource allocation and oversight. Additionally, how institutions interpret and act upon the benchmarks for credit acceptance could lead to differing experiences for students across the state.