Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB2913

Introduced
2/1/21  
Refer
2/2/21  
Refer
2/22/21  
Report Pass
5/17/21  
Engrossed
5/18/21  
Enrolled
5/20/21  

Caption

Courts; Administrative Director of the Courts; clarifying duties; effective date.

Impact

The bill is expected to enhance the operational efficiency of the court system in Oklahoma by establishing a clear framework for the Administrative Director's duties. By consolidating management responsibilities related to budget, personnel, and technology, the bill facilitates better oversight and potentially improves the efficacy of court functions. This structural clarity could lead to improved resource allocation and more coordinated administration across various court levels, contributing positively to the judicial process.

Summary

House Bill 2913 amends existing legislation regarding the responsibilities of the Administrative Director of the Courts in Oklahoma. The bill clarifies the director's duties, including overseeing the budget, personnel, technology, and various administrative operations pertinent to all state courts, including the Court of Civil Appeals and the Court of Criminal Appeals. This change aims to streamline judicial administration within the state by clearly defining the scope of responsibility entrusted to the Administrative Director, thereby assisting the Chief Justice in managing court operations more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2913 appeared to be largely positive among legislators. The amendments are seen as a necessary adjustment to evolve with the changing demands of court administration. With no recorded opposition during discussions or votes, the bill was met with consensus, indicating broad support for enhancing clarity and efficiency within the judicial system. This collaborative attitude reflects a recognition of the importance of administrative roles in court functionality.

Contention

Despite the bill's smooth passage through legislative channels, some concerns might arise regarding the concentration of administrative power. By placing significant control in the hands of the Administrative Director under the Supreme Court's purview, critics may argue about the potential for diminished checks and balances within the judicial administrative framework. However, the overall discussions indicate that the advantages of clear administrative responsibilities outweighed such concerns, leading to its unanimous support.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OK HB2513

Courts; clarifying duties of the Administrative Director; effective date.

OK SB1456

Workers' Compensation Court of Existing Claims; establishing Court of Existing Claims Division of the Court of Civil Appeals; transferring certain duties to Administrative Director of Courts. Effective date. Emergency.

OK HB2771

Courts; special judges; increasing number in specific counties; effective date; emergency.

OK HB4118

Courts; court reporter salaries; secretary-bailiff salaries; effective date; emergency.

OK HB2646

Medical marijuana; clarifying duties of the Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority; codification; effective date.

OK SB343

Court fines and costs; clarifying authority of courts to collect certain fines and costs through tax warrant intercept. Effective date.

OK SB367

Impaired driving; clarifying use of certain licensing authority. Effective date.

OK HB2430

Courts; jurors' pay; effective date.

OK SB240

District courts; clarifying judge required to establish drug court docket. Effective date.

OK SB240

District courts; clarifying judge required to establish drug court docket. Effective date.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.