If passed, HJR1006 will lead to substantial changes in state law regarding digital entities operating within Oklahoma. The proposal would invalidate certain End User License Agreements (EULAs) that contain clauses allowing for censorship, thereby enabling legal recourse for citizens facing restrictions on their digital expression. Furthermore, the resolution mandates the establishment of mechanisms to provide financial compensation to those affected by digital monopolies, which would address concerns regarding fair competition in the market. This provision reflects a growing apprehension about the power held by major technology firms and their algorithms, which can influence user behavior and limit access to information.
Summary
HJR1006 is a proposed joint resolution that seeks to amend the Oklahoma Constitution by introducing new provisions aimed at regulating various aspects of digital technology, particularly focusing on Skinner Box algorithms. Skinner Box algorithms refer to methods used in digital platforms to engage users through rewards and notifications, which can lead to compulsive behaviors. The resolution aims to require the Oklahoma Legislature to create laws that govern the manufacture, sale, and distribution of these algorithms, ensuring stringent control and licensing processes. A significant feature of the resolution is the imposition of a 90% annual revenue fine on entities that engage in censorship, as defined by relevant federal laws, thereby imposing heavy penalties for non-compliance with free speech protections.
Contention
The bill has generated debate among lawmakers and various stakeholders due to the balance it seeks to achieve between regulating digital technology and protecting free speech. Proponents argue that the regulation of Skinner Box algorithms is essential to prevent exploitation and ensure that users are not manipulated by digital platforms. Conversely, critics are concerned that stringent regulations could stifle innovation and limit the functionality of digital services. There are also fears that penalizing companies for censorship might lead to broader interpretations that could chill legitimate content moderation practices, thus complicating the operational landscape for tech companies in Oklahoma.
Classification of felony offenses; creating the Oklahoma Crime Reclassification Act of 2024; requiring persons who commit criminal offenses to be classified in accordance with certain structure; codification; effective date.