Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1022

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 2/11/21
• Engrossed: 3/9/21
• Refer: 3/22/21
• Report Pass: 4/1/21
• Enrolled: 5/6/21
• Passed: 5/10/21

Caption

Water and water rights; authorizing Executive Director to issue certain permits. Effective date.

Impact

This legislation specifically impacts the framework under which the Oklahoma Water Resources Board operates, allowing for a more agile response in managing state water resources. By empowering the Executive Director to issue permits more effectively, the bill intends to enhance the efficiency of water resource management, an essential aspect of governance in a state where water rights and availability can significantly affect agricultural and urban needs alike. The delegation of specific powers is designed to ensure that the Board can respond to changes in demand and regulatory requirements without unnecessary delays.

Summary

Senate Bill 1022 (SB1022) focuses on the governance of water rights within the state of Oklahoma. The bill amends Section 1085.12 of the Oklahoma statutes to grant greater authority to the Executive Director of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Notably, the bill introduces gender-neutral language throughout the text and modifies the reference to the Board itself. The primary aim of this legislation is to clarify and expand the powers of the Executive Director regarding the issuance of temporary and regular permits, streamlining the operational process of managing water resources in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1022 appears largely supportive among those who advocate for more effective and responsive water resource management in Oklahoma. Proponents of the bill argue that it facilitates necessary modernization within the Board, bolstering their ability to handle pressing water issues efficiently. However, there may be concerns regarding the extent of power being delegated, with some stakeholders worried that it could centralize authority too heavily, thereby inhibiting local input and oversight in water management decisions.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB1022 is the potential implications for community involvement in water management. Opponents of such consolidations of power within state entities often express concerns that local insights and needs may become overshadowed, especially in matters related to sensitive water sources. The bill provides exceptions for permits concerning sensitive sole source aquifers, suggesting a balance is sought, but critics worry that the Executive Director's increased authority could lead to decisions that do not reflect local priorities or environmental considerations.