Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1825

Introduced
2/7/22  

Caption

Courts; limiting duration of special judge appointments. Effective date.

Impact

The implementation of SB 1825 is expected to affect judicial administration throughout the state. By placing a two-year limit on special judge appointments, the bill introduces a measure of regularity and potential turnover within the special judge roles, which might help address issues of judicial backlog and improve the management of cases in overpopulated districts. Additionally, allowing special judges to be appointed from different counties within the same district may enhance the pool of available judges, further aiding in the effective administration of justice.

Summary

Senate Bill 1825, introduced by Senator Merrick, modifies the current provisions regarding the appointment of special judges in the state of Oklahoma. The bill specifically limits the duration of special judge appointments to a maximum of two years. It retains existing criteria for the appointment of special judges based on population thresholds within the judicial administrative districts. The bill also allows for cross-county appointments within the same judicial administrative district, which is aimed at improving judicial flexibility and efficiency.

Contention

There may be points of contention surrounding SB 1825, particularly regarding the implications of frequent changes in special judges. Critics might argue that stability is essential within the judiciary, and frequent changes could disrupt ongoing cases or lead to a lack of continuity in judicial proceedings. There could also be concerns about potentially politicizing appointments if positions are frequently reassigned. However, proponents may advocate that this approach will increase responsiveness and adaptability to the changing caseloads within judicial districts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OK HB2771

Courts; special judges; increasing number in specific counties; effective date; emergency.

OK SB1173

Courts; adding two special judges to be appointed in certain district. Effective date. Emergency.

OK SB632

Business courts; creating business court divisions in certain judicial districts; providing for appointment of business court judges; specifying authority and jurisdiction of business court. Effective date.

OK SB462

Municipal courts; requiring municipal judges to complete certain certification program by specified date; establishing maximum allowable fine to be imposed by certain municipal courts. Effective date.

OK SB462

Municipal courts; requiring municipal judges to complete certain certification program by specified date; establishing maximum allowable fine to be imposed by certain municipal courts. Effective date.

OK HB3810

Courts; Justices and judges; confidential information; penalty; effective date.

OK SB1458

Courts; transfer of funds; eliminating certain fees. Effective date.

OK HB307

Courts, appointment, support, and powers of visiting judges provided for

OK SB178

Courts, appointment, support, and powers of visiting judges provided for

OK HB2632

Relating to specialty courts.

Similar Bills

MS SB2807

West Bolivar Consolidated School District; deconsolidate to form the West Bolivar, Shaw and Benoit School Districts.

CA SB645

School finance: administrative employees to teacher ratio.

CA AB1577

California Safe Drinking Water Act: Sativa-Los Angeles County Water District.

MS HB1524

School district administrative consolidation; require for all public school districts in Washington County.

TX SB2384

Relating to the creation of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Regional Administrative Judicial Districts, the creation of the office of regional district attorney for each district, and the powers and duties of regional district attorneys.

NJ A1524

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

MS HB797

Judicial operating allowance and district attorney; revise to increase.

NJ S1751

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.