Oklahoma Senate Bill SB456

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 2/8/21
• Refer: 2/8/21
• Report Pass: 2/24/21
• Engrossed: 3/3/21
• Refer: 3/22/21
• Report Pass: 4/15/21
• Enrolled: 5/3/21
• Passed: 5/5/21

Caption

Offenders; modifying eligibility for electronic monitoring. Effective date.

Impact

The changes proposed in SB456 aim to enhance the rehabilitation of nonviolent offenders by allowing them to serve their sentences with electronic monitoring in the community rather than incarceration. By modifying eligibility, the state seeks to reduce prison overcrowding and enable inmates to reintegrate into society under supervision. This adjustment has significant implications for state law regarding how inmates are monitored and the responsibilities of correctional facilities.

Summary

SB456 focuses on modifying the eligibility criteria for the Electronic Monitoring Program overseen by the Department of Corrections in Oklahoma. The bill primarily targets nonviolent offenders, establishing clear guidelines for who may be eligible for electronic monitoring while serving their time outside of a traditional correctional facility. Under the new provisions, inmates sentenced for nonviolent crimes may be eligible, while those with violent offenses, longer sentences, or other disqualifying factors will remain ineligible for the program.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB456 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who believe in the potential of electronic monitoring to facilitate rehabilitation and community integration for nonviolent offenders. However, there are also concerns voiced by those cautious of the safety implications and the definitions used to classify offenders as nonviolent. The discussions have implied a need for a balanced approach that ensures public safety while aiding the reintegration of those convicted of less severe offenses.

Contention

Critics of SB456 may raise issues related to the definitions of violent versus nonviolent offenses and the requirements for eligibility for the Electronic Monitoring Program. Additionally, discussions have highlighted concerns over public perception and safety, especially regarding oversight of electronic monitoring and the consequences for inmates who might violate program conditions. The bill opens the door to significant changes in how offenders are managed post-conviction, which undoubtedly will lead to discussions about effectiveness and fairness.