Oklahoma Senate Bill SB80

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 2/28/22
• Engrossed: 3/10/22
• Refer: 3/31/22
• Report Pass: 4/7/22
• Enrolled: 4/20/22
• Passed: 4/21/22

Caption

Professions and occupations; modifying requirements for unarmed security guards. Effective date.

Impact

The amendment intends to bolster the accountability and professionalism of unarmed security personnel in the state by enforcing a stricter licensing requirement. By establishing a clear timeline for obtaining a license, the bill seeks to prevent individuals from operating without the proper credentials. This enhancement in regulatory oversight is poised to improve the overall standards of security services, contributing to public safety and confidence in the security industry.

Summary

Senate Bill 80 focuses on amending the licensing requirements for unarmed security guards in Oklahoma. The bill modifies the existing provisions in the Oklahoma Security Guard and Private Investigator Act, specifically mandating that individuals employed as unarmed security guards must obtain a license issued by the Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training within a 45-day period from their employment. This change aims to streamline the licensing process and ensure that all individuals in the security profession are adequately trained and vetted before they can serve in this capacity.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB 80 has been generally positive across legislative discussions, with many lawmakers acknowledging the need for improved standards in the security sector. There appears to be a collective agreement that strengthening licensing requirements will help to elevate the credibility of security services. However, there may be concerns among security agencies regarding the administrative burden this bill places on them to ensure their employees comply with the new licensing timeline.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the 45-day requirement for obtaining a license, as critics might argue that this timeline could be challenging for new hires and security agencies, particularly in ensuring that there is no gap in operational readiness. While the intent is clear in promoting a well-regulated security workforce, balancing the quick deployment of personnel with rigorous training and vetting processes remains a potential area of debate.