Revenue and taxation; creating the Caring for Caregivers Act; creating family caregiver tax credit; credit caps; authorizing Tax Commission to promulgate rules; effective date.
If enacted, HB 1029 would significantly impact state revenue by providing tax credits that could relieve some financial burdens on family caregivers. It is intended to encourage caregiving and support for aging individuals. However, the total amount of credits authorized shall not exceed $1.5 million annually. This cap means that if demand exceeds this limit, the credits could be adjusted and limited in subsequent years, raising questions about the sustainability and continuous benefit of the program for caregivers.
House Bill 1029, known as the Caring for Caregivers Act, establishes a tax credit for family caregivers providing support to eligible family members. The bill defines 'family caregiver' as individuals who earn less than $50,000 (or less than $100,000 for couples) and have incurred out-of-pocket costs related to their caregiving responsibilities. Eligible family members must be at least 62 years old, require assistance with at least two activities of daily living (ADLs), and not live in assisted living facilities. The proposed credit allows caregivers to claim 50% of eligible expenditures, with maximum credits available set at $2,000 or $3,000 for veterans and those diagnosed with dementia.
The sentiment surrounding HB 1029 appears to be generally supportive among legislators and advocacy groups focused on caregiving and aging issues. They view the tax credit as a positive step towards recognizing the contributions of family caregivers. However, there are concerns about the cap on credits and the bureaucratic processes involved in administering the program. Some committee members and stakeholders have expressed that while the bill is a step forward, more comprehensive support for caregivers is necessary beyond just tax credits.
Notable points of contention include the potential inadequacy of the credit cap to meet actual caregiver needs and questions regarding the definition of eligible expenditures. Some critics point out that the bill may not sufficiently address the complexities and varied nature of caregiving costs. Furthermore, the process for determining income eligibility and the burden of applying for these tax credits could pose challenges for some caregivers, highlighting the necessity to balance financial support with accessible implementation.