Oklahoma House Bill HR1001

Oklahoma 2023 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 6/12/23

Caption

A Resolution informing the Oklahoma State Senate that the Oklahoma House of Representatives is rescinding the passage of and will not comply with the dates and provisions of SCR2x.

Impact

The passage of HR1001 effectively negates the provisions of SCR2x, thereby affecting any scheduled actions mandated by that resolution. This move could have implications for legislative planning and procedural compliance moving forward, especially concerning the timelines for the session and any subsequent legislative responsibilities that might have been contingent on SCR2x. The resolution directly alters the legislative landscape by reestablishing control over scheduling and procedural adherence by the House.

Summary

House Resolution 1001 (HR1001) serves as a formal declaration by the Oklahoma House of Representatives, stating its decision to rescind the previous passage of SCR2x. This resolution underscores the House's unwillingness to adhere to the timelines and stipulations outlined in SCR2x, particularly given the impracticality of the adjournment date established by the earlier resolution. This action reflects the dynamic nature of legislative processes, especially within extraordinary sessions, where timing and compliance can take on critical importance.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding HR1001 appears to be one of practicality and a reflection of the necessity for operational flexibility in the legislature. While specific sentiments from individual legislators were not documented in the snippets reviewed, the need to rescind SCR2x suggests a consensus among House members on the impracticality of adhering to its guidelines. This indicates an understanding of the reality of legislative operations that may not always align with initially proposed schedules.

Contention

One notable point of contention includes the implications of rescinding SCR2x, particularly as it may affect the Senate's operational timeline and legislative commitments. The decision may lead to discussions about timelines and cooperative legislative strategies between the House and Senate, especially in the context of upcoming legislative agendas. Opposition or challenges might arise concerning the decision's implications on lawmaking efficiency and inter-chamber relations within Oklahoma's legislative framework.