Administrative Procedures Act; establishing guidelines for court interpretation of statutes, rules, or other regulations. Effective date.
Impact
If enacted, SB192 would significantly alter the dynamics between state agencies and individuals contesting agency decisions. It emphasizes an independent judicial evaluation of agency rules, which could lead to a more favorable environment for those feeling aggrieved by agency actions. This promotes individual liberty by allowing courts greater discretion in interpreting agency rules, potentially limiting agency power and enhancing accountability.
Summary
Senate Bill 192 seeks to amend the Administrative Procedures Act, specifically focusing on enhancing the judicial review process of final agency orders. The bill requires that courts and administrative hearing officers provide a de novo interpretation of statutes, rules, or regulations when reviewing decisions made by state agencies. This change is intended to ensure a more equitable judicial process where individuals can challenge agency interpretations without deferring to those interpretations, thereby promoting the protection of individual rights against potential agency overreach.
Contention
Discussion surrounding SB192 may evoke a divide between supporters who value the balance of individual rights against administrative authority, and opponents who might argue the changes could hinder the efficiency of administrative processes. Critics may express concerns that an increased burden on courts could lead to delays in case resolution, complicating the administrative process rather than simplifying it. Furthermore, there could be apprehension about the implications this bill could have on regulatory enforcement and state agencies’ ability to implement their missions effectively.
Administrative Procedures Act; judicial review; providing for timing of certain claim; requiring interpretation of statute, rule, or regulation be provided; establishing guidelines; effective date.