Oklahoma Senate Bill SB255

Oklahoma 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23
• Report Pass: 2/9/23
• Engrossed: 3/6/23
• Refer: 3/29/23
• Report Pass: 4/5/23
• Enrolled: 4/19/23
• Passed: 4/20/23

Caption

Petroleum Storage Tank Consolidation Act; requiring motor fuel with certain amount of ethanol to be labeled pursuant to federal requirements. Effective date.

Impact

The bill's impact is primarily in enhancing the transparency of fuel contents for consumers, aligning state requirements with federal guidelines set by the Environmental Protection Agency. By mandating specific labeling, the bill aims to inform consumers about the percentages of ethanol and methanol in the fuel, thus potentially influencing their purchasing decisions and promoting environmental awareness regarding alternative fuel sources. This could have implications for both public health and environmental policy as consumers become more informed about fuel compositions.

Summary

Senate Bill 255, also known as the Oklahoma Petroleum Storage Tank Consolidation Act, amends existing law regarding the labeling requirements for motor fuels containing specific amounts of ethanol or methanol. The bill mandates that any motor fuel containing at least one percent of these substances must have clear labeling on the dispensers where fuel is sold. The labels must adhere to federal standards, providing consumers with essential information about the contents of the fuel being purchased.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB255 appears to be generally favorable, especially among environmental advocates and consumers focused on transparency in fuel usage. Supporters believe that increased labeling can foster a more informed public, encouraging the use of renewable fuels. However, there may also be industry concerns regarding the financial implications of compliance with these new labeling requirements, which could reflect some resistance from fuel retailers who may see this as an additional regulatory burden.

Contention

While the bill seems to garner support for its transparency goals, contention exists around the cost of implementation for retailers and the influence of larger fuel corporations. Industry stakeholders may argue that stringent labeling could lead to higher operational costs, which could ultimately be passed on to consumers. Additionally, there are concerns about the efficacy of labels in influencing consumer choices, as some may feel that the market will determine fuel preferences more significantly than information presented at the pump.