Memorial roads and bridges; designating the Trooper Larry L. Hillyard Memorial Bridge. Effective date.
If enacted, SB691 will add a new section to the Oklahoma Statutes which allows for the official designation of memorial bridges throughout the state. Such legislation serves to commemorate individuals who have made significant contributions or sacrifices, thereby boosting community morale and affording respect to those who serve the public. Permanent markers will be placed on the bridge to acknowledge its new name, ensuring that the memory of Trooper Hillyard is preserved in the public domain.
Senate Bill 691, known as the Trooper Larry L. Hillyard Memorial Bridge Act, proposes to honor Trooper Larry L. Hillyard by designating the bridge crossing over Polecat Creek on U.S. Highway 75A south of Sapulpa in Creek County as the 'Trooper Larry L. Hillyard Memorial Bridge'. This act aims to create a lasting tribute to Trooper Hillyard, who served the state, particularly in law enforcement, and is recognized for his valor and service. The bill was introduced by Senator Floyd and is set to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes under the new section title for recognition purposes.
The sentiment surrounding SB691 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as it is supported by many within the legislative body and among the public who understand the importance of honoring law enforcement officers. The act serves to unite the community in recognizing the sacrifices made by law enforcement personnel and reflects a broader respect for those who serve in dangerous capacities. There seems to be a consensus that such recognitions are beneficial for community bonding and historical remembrance.
There are no significant points of contention regarding SB691, as it unanimously passed the Committee on Aeronautics and Transportation with a vote of 12 to 0. The lack of debate or opposition suggests that the bill is widely accepted and viewed more as a tribute than a contentious policy measure. However, discussions may arise in the future about the broader implications of memorializing individuals in state infrastructure, potentially in different contexts.