Electric provider easements; defining terms; providing for use of certain easements for broadband services; effective date.
One of the significant changes brought by HB2290 is the prohibition on class action lawsuits against electric providers or their broadband subsidiaries in cases related to expanded use of easements. This stipulation could protect electric providers from collective legal actions, which advocates argue could otherwise serve as a deterrent to investment in broadband infrastructure. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that damages will be calculated based solely on the fair market value of property before and after any installation, limiting the extent to which property owners can claim compensation for loss of use.
House Bill 2290 seeks to modify regulations surrounding electric provider easements in Oklahoma by allowing these easements to be used for high-speed broadband services. Specifically, the bill establishes definitions for key terms and permits approved broadband providers to operate within existing electric easements, thereby facilitating greater access to broadband in rural or underserved areas. This initiative is aimed at leveraging existing infrastructure to improve telecommunications capabilities, addressing the growing need for high-speed internet access in the state.
Opponents of HB2290 may express concerns regarding the implications for property rights, particularly the limitations on property owners' ability to pursue class action lawsuits for perceived damages. By deeming certain claims of trespass or nuisance as permanent, the bill may restrict the legal recourse available to those adversely affected by the broadband installations. These contentions highlight a potential conflict between the need for expanded broadband services and the rights of property owners to seek redress for disruptions in their property use.