Oklahoma House Bill HB2823

Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23

Caption

Sunset; Oversight Committee for State Employee Charitable Contributions; re-creating Committee; modifying termination date; emergency.

Impact

The passage of HB 2823 would reaffirm the state's commitment to enabling charitable contributions by state employees and ensure there is a systematic approach in overseeing the integrity of the contributions program. It maintains the structure necessary for effective evaluation and approval of charitable organizations wishing to participate, thereby solidifying the process through which state employees can support community causes. Additionally, it highlights the state's recognition of the importance of fostering a culture of giving among public employees.

Summary

House Bill 2823 is a legislative measure aimed at the Oversight Committee for State Employee Charitable Contributions in Oklahoma. The bill seeks to amend Section 7005 of Title 74 of the Oklahoma Statutes by re-creating the Oversight Committee. This Committee is responsible for overseeing the State Employee Charitable Contributions program, which allows state employees to contribute to various charitable organizations through payroll deductions. The significant aspect of the bill is the modification of the termination date for the Committee, extending its existence to July 1, 2028, thereby ensuring its continued operation and oversight in the years to come.

Contention

While the bill primarily focuses on re-establishing the Oversight Committee’s authority and mission, discussions may arise regarding the overall effectiveness of the charitable contributions program and how well it serves the community needs. Critics might question whether the oversight provided is sufficient or if it adequately addresses concerns related to the allocation of funds among various charities. However, as the discussions surrounding HB 2823 seem to function primarily within the framework of maintaining existing structures rather than introducing dramatic changes, the contention appears to be less about the bill's content and more about the efficacy of ongoing charitable efforts.