Public funds; creating the ARPA Administrative Costs Fund; establishing fund characteristics; limiting appropriations and transfer authority; deposits; emergency.
Impact
The introduction of HB2940 is anticipated to have significant implications for state budgeting and financial management. By creating a designated fund for ARPA-related administrative expenses, the bill allows for a more streamlined and transparent process of appropriating funds. The exclusivity of the fund to specific administrative costs also suggests an intention to limit the potential misuse of these federal resources. This structured approach aims to ensure that the financial support provided through ARPA is utilized effectively and monitored closely, thus potentially impacting the state’s fiscal responsibilities and accountability.
Summary
House Bill 2940 aims to establish the ARPA Administrative Costs Fund within the State Treasury of Oklahoma. This legislative initiative is initiated to facilitate the management and allocation of public funds specifically aimed at covering the administrative costs associated with the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). The bill outlines the creation of this special fund, which will consist of all monies appropriated or transferred into it by the Legislature, thereby enhancing the state's financial framework for managing federal funds intended for public use.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the passage of HB2940 appears to be largely positive among lawmakers, as indicated by its strong voting history consisting of 90 yeas against only 6 nays during the third reading in the House. The bill's approval reflects a broader consensus on the necessity of establishing financial mechanisms that support emergency preparedness and response. Lawmakers seem to recognize the importance of having a consistent approach to managing federal funds to address evolving public needs effectively.
Contention
While there may be minimal contention noted in the legislative discourse regarding the bill, the establishment of dedicated funds may raise concerns related to oversight and accountability. Stakeholders in public finance may question how the outlined appropriations will be monitored to prevent any regulatory lapses. Furthermore, potential debates could arise regarding the classifications of what constitutes appropriate administrative costs, as this could ultimately affect the disbursement and utilization of the funds essential for public welfare.
Carry Over
Public funds; creating the ARPA Administrative Costs Fund; establishing fund characteristics; limiting appropriations and transfer authority; deposits; emergency.
Public funds; creating the ARPA Administrative Costs Fund; establishing fund characteristics; limiting appropriations and transfer authority; deposits; emergency.
Administrative Workers' Compensation Act; costs; distribution of certain funds; limiting period of certain distribution; return; effective date; emergency.
Medical marijuana; modifying the Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority Revolving Fund: limiting funding source; creating the Medical Marijuana Tax Fund. Effective date. Emergency.
Legacy Capital Financing Act; creating the Legacy Capital Financing Fund; placing with the Capitol Improvement Authority; limiting uses; recapitalization payments; schedule; emergency.
Human trafficking; creating the Victims of Human Trafficking and Prevention Revolving Fund; characteristics; placing under control of the Attorney General; limiting usage of funds; budgetary requirements and limitations; purposes. Effective date.
Department of Emergency Management and Homeland Security; creating the Emergency Relief and Impacts Grant Program; establishing Emergency Relief and Imipacts Revolving Fund; emergency.
Department of Human Services; requiring certain joint approval prior to certain actions; appropriating certain federal funds for certain program; authorizing certain transfers; providing for lapse of funds under certain conditions.