State government; prohibiting purchase of small unmanned aircraft systems manufactured by certain foreign entities; providing exceptions; codification; effective date.
Impact
If enacted, HB3068 will directly restrict Oklahoma's public entities from using state funding for purchasing or operating sUAS produced by certain foreign sources. This includes bans on both the procurement and operational aspects post a specified date (May 1, 2027). The implications of such a law will play a critical role in how Oklahoma manages drone technology development and deployment. Compliance will necessitate a reassessment of existing contracts and relationships with manufacturers of sUAS to ensure adherence to the new legal framework.
Summary
House Bill 3068 aims to prohibit the purchase and operation of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) that are manufactured or assembled by certain foreign entities. Specifically, the bill targets entities linked to China or Russia, classifying these as 'covered foreign entities'. The primary goal is to mitigate potential risks to national security by limiting the state's engagement with technologies that might be susceptible to foreign influence or control. This law represents a significant shift towards safeguarding public resources and infrastructure from perceived foreign threats.
Contention
The bill is likely to spark debate about its scope and effectiveness. Proponents argue that the restrictions are essential for national security and reflect a growing recognition of the geopolitical landscape influenced by foreign powers. However, critics may contend that the bill could stifle technological innovation and economic opportunities within the state, particularly if local companies are inadvertently affected by these broad prohibitions. Furthermore, the allowance for waiver under exigent circumstances raises questions about the criteria and decision-making processes involved in such exceptions.
Firearm suppressors; providing exemptions for manufactured, sold and purchased in this state from federal laws and regulations; prohibiting certain regulations; codification; effective date.
State government; modifying duties of the Attorney General; allowing for investigation of foreign entities for certain purchases near military installations. Effective date.
Firearms; defining terms; providing applicability provision; prohibiting governmental entities from contracting with companies without certain written verification. Effective date.