Constitutional amendment; providing exception; requiring any proposal for supermajority approval of a state question to receive the same supermajority approval at the election; ballot title.
Impact
The implications of HJR1055 on state law are significant as it seeks to clarify and solidify the voting process for measures that demand a supermajority. By removing ambiguity about the approval process and affirming that the same supermajority standard must be met during voting as was established in the proposal, the amendment aims to enhance democratic processes in Oklahoma. This change could lead to more rigorous campaigns for public support, potentially affecting voter turnout and engagement in state questions that require enhanced approval.
Summary
HJR1055 is a proposed Joint Resolution designed to amend Section 3 of Article V of the Oklahoma Constitution. This amendment mandates that any proposal requiring supermajority approval for a state question must also receive the same level of supermajority approval at the election where the proposal is voted on. Essentially, if a legislative measure proposes that approval should be more than a simple majority, that same standard applies during the election process, ensuring consistency in the voting requirements for such measures.
Contention
Potential points of contention surrounding HJR1055 may arise regarding the impact of supermajority requirements on the legislative process. Opponents might argue that such requirements could hinder the passage of critical measures by making it more difficult to reach the necessary approval threshold. Supporters might counter that ensuring a more substantial consensus for significant changes reflects a more robust democratic principle, thereby preventing hasty or unconsidered amendments to the Constitution. Discussions on HJR1055 are likely to explore the balance between efficient governance and reflective democracy.
Constitutional amendment; limiting state questions on ballot to odd-numbered years; requiring proposed constitutional amendments or state questions to receive certain majority vote.
Planning and zoning; requiring certain easements to be approved by certain governing bodies; requiring boards of county commissioners approval for certain proposals. Emergency.
Constitutional amendment; changing the percentage of legal voters from statewide to each congressional district of the state for certain petitions; ballot title; filing.
Constitutional amendment; requiring State Auditor and Inspector to have three years of experience as a certified public accountant; ballot title; filing.
Constitutional amendment; changing the percentage of legal voters from statewide to each congressional district of the state for certain petitions; ballot title; filing.