Legislature; limiting certain regular session to certain forms of legislation. Effective date.
Impact
The bill's restriction to repealer-only legislation in the second session could impact how legislators approach their legislative agendas. By limiting the types of legislation available during this session, proponents may argue that it allows for a more focused and efficient use of time, possibly giving more attention to the critical task of budget legislation that can still be addressed in both sessions. However, this could also inadvertently stifle innovation or necessary amendments to existing laws if they cannot be considered in the second session.
Summary
Senate Bill 1990, introduced by Senator Dahm, proposes a significant restructuring of how legislation can be considered during the regular sessions of the Oklahoma Legislature. Starting with the 60th Legislature, the bill mandates that the second regular session can only entertain legislation that consists exclusively of repealers of current statutes. The aim is to confine the types of legislation introduced in the second session, which may streamline the legislative process and reduce the volume of new laws being considered in a single session.
Contention
Opponents of SB1990 may raise concerns about the bill's potential to create bureaucratic stagnation, particularly if urgent issues arise that require legislative action but do not fall under the category of repealers. Critics may argue that the ability to amend existing laws or introduce new legislation should not be restricted, especially given the dynamic nature of state governance where unforeseen issues often demand immediate legislative response. Thus, the bill faces scrutiny regarding its practicality and the impact it may have on addressing the needs of constituents effectively.