Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB1022

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/27/25  
Engrossed
3/17/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Enrolled
5/15/25  

Caption

Motor vehicles; failure to yield; requiring payment of fee for certain convictions; modifying fee; effective date.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 1022 are designed to increase safety awareness on the roads by imposing financial repercussions on drivers who fail to yield and cause serious accidents. The objective is to fund educational initiatives that can potentially mitigate such incidents in the future. By regulating the consequences of right-of-way violations more stringently, the bill reflects a commitment to enhancing highway safety and decreasing the occurrences of severe accidents, particularly involving motorcyclists and vulnerable road users.

Summary

House Bill 1022 addresses motor vehicle regulations specifically pertaining to the issue of failure to yield the right-of-way. The bill amends Section 11-403.1, establishing new fees for individuals convicted of failing to yield, particularly when such failure results in fatalities or serious bodily injuries. The maximum fee is set at $1,000 for fatalities caused by this violation and $500 for serious bodily injuries, with the collected fees directed to the Motorcycle Safety and Education Program Revolving Fund. This fund aims to promote awareness about the dangers of driving under the influence and to enhance motorcycle safety and driving education for youth.

Sentiment

There appears to be general support for HB 1022 among legislators, as evidenced by a substantial margin of approval in the House, with 77 votes in favor compared to 8 against. Proponents argue that the bill promotes safer driving behavior and addresses a critical public safety concern. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the enforcement of such fees and how they will impact individuals who may already be in vulnerable situations following an accident.

Contention

While the bill has garnered significant support, some points of contention may arise regarding the appropriateness of financial penalties as a deterrent for driving violations. Critics may argue that imposing additional fees could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals or those who are already dealing with the ramifications of accidents. The necessity of the fee assessment and its effectiveness in changing driver behavior will likely remain focal points of discussion as the bill progresses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.