39 | 36 | | |
---|
40 | 37 | | |
---|
41 | 38 | | |
---|
42 | 39 | | |
---|
43 | 40 | | An Act relating to alcohol ic beverages; defining |
---|
44 | 41 | | terms; making certain actions by an employee not |
---|
45 | 42 | | attributable to licensed establishments; providing an |
---|
46 | 43 | | affirmative defense under certain circumstances ; |
---|
47 | 44 | | requiring licensed establishments to present certain |
---|
48 | 45 | | information when asserting the affirmative defense; |
---|
49 | 46 | | attributing certain actions by an employee to the |
---|
50 | 47 | | licensed establishment ; creating a rebuttable |
---|
51 | 48 | | presumption that a licensed establishment has |
---|
52 | 49 | | indirectly encouraged violation s of the law by |
---|
53 | 50 | | employees; authorizing the ABLE Commission to present |
---|
54 | 51 | | evidence to establish a rebuttable presumption ; |
---|
55 | 52 | | stating which party has the burden of persuasion; |
---|
56 | 53 | | providing construing provision ; providing for |
---|
57 | 54 | | codification; and providing an effective date. |
---|
58 | 55 | | |
---|
59 | 56 | | |
---|
60 | 57 | | |
---|
61 | 58 | | |
---|
62 | 59 | | |
---|
63 | 60 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: |
---|
64 | 61 | | SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified |
---|
65 | 62 | | in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6 -130 of Title 37A, unless there |
---|
66 | 63 | | is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: |
---|
67 | 64 | | As used in this section: |
---|
68 | 65 | | 1. "Employee" means any person paid by an establishment |
---|
69 | 66 | | licensed by the Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement (ABLE) |
---|
98 | 94 | | or to immediately manage, direct, supervise, or control the sale or |
---|
99 | 95 | | service of alcoholic beverages; and |
---|
100 | 96 | | 2. "Seller-server training certificate" means a certificate |
---|
101 | 97 | | granted for completing an Oklahoma seller -server certification |
---|
102 | 98 | | course recognized by the ABLE Commission. |
---|
103 | 99 | | SECTION 2. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified |
---|
104 | 100 | | in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6 -130.1 of Title 37A, unless |
---|
105 | 101 | | there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: |
---|
106 | 102 | | A. Certain actions of an employee are not attributable to |
---|
107 | 103 | | an establishment licensed by the Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement |
---|
108 | 104 | | (ABLE) Commission and shall be an affirmative defense to such |
---|
109 | 105 | | liability when such licensed establishment receives a notice of |
---|
110 | 106 | | violation for certain actions of an employee. |
---|
111 | 107 | | B. The following actions of an employee of a licensed |
---|
112 | 108 | | establishment are not attributable to the licensed establishment: |
---|
113 | 109 | | 1. The selling, furnishing, or giving of an alcoholic beverage |
---|
114 | 110 | | to: |
---|
115 | 111 | | a. a person who is insane or men tally deficient, |
---|
116 | 112 | | b. a minor, or |
---|
117 | 113 | | c. an intoxicated person; or |
---|
118 | 114 | | 2. Allowing the consumption of an alcoholic beverage by: |
---|
119 | 115 | | a. a person who is insane or mentally deficient, |
---|
120 | 116 | | b. a minor, or |
---|
149 | 144 | | C. A licensed establishment may assert the aff irmative defense |
---|
150 | 145 | | if the license establishment: |
---|
151 | 146 | | 1. Required all employee s to maintain a currently valid |
---|
152 | 147 | | employee license from the ABLE Commission; |
---|
153 | 148 | | 2. Required each employee to present a seller -server training |
---|
154 | 149 | | certificate within fourteen (14) days of his o r her initial |
---|
155 | 150 | | employment date, unless the employee is deemed exempt by an existing |
---|
156 | 151 | | statute and require each employee to attend a seller -server training |
---|
157 | 152 | | course every two (2) years upon renewal of the employee license and |
---|
158 | 153 | | attend a seller-server training cour se every two (2) years after the |
---|
159 | 154 | | initial employment date, unless an employee is exempt pursuant to |
---|
160 | 155 | | Section 2-121 of Title 37A of the Oklahoma Statutes; |
---|
161 | 156 | | 3. Adopted written policies and procedures which prohibit: |
---|
162 | 157 | | a. the sale, service, dispensation, or deliv ery of an |
---|
163 | 158 | | alcoholic beverage to: |
---|
164 | 159 | | (1) a person who is insane or mentally deficient, |
---|
165 | 160 | | (2) a minor, or |
---|
166 | 161 | | (3) an intoxicated person, or |
---|
167 | 162 | | b. the employee from allowing consumption of an alcoholic |
---|
168 | 163 | | beverage by: |
---|
169 | 164 | | (1) a person who is insane or mentally deficient, |
---|
170 | 165 | | (2) a minor, or |
---|
171 | 166 | | (3) an intoxicated person; and |
---|
172 | 167 | | |
---|
175 | 169 | | 2 |
---|
176 | 170 | | 3 |
---|
177 | 171 | | 4 |
---|
178 | 172 | | 5 |
---|
179 | 173 | | 6 |
---|
180 | 174 | | 7 |
---|
181 | 175 | | 8 |
---|
182 | 176 | | 9 |
---|
183 | 177 | | 10 |
---|
184 | 178 | | 11 |
---|
185 | 179 | | 12 |
---|
186 | 180 | | 13 |
---|
187 | 181 | | 14 |
---|
188 | 182 | | 15 |
---|
189 | 183 | | 16 |
---|
190 | 184 | | 17 |
---|
191 | 185 | | 18 |
---|
192 | 186 | | 19 |
---|
193 | 187 | | 20 |
---|
194 | 188 | | 21 |
---|
195 | 189 | | 22 |
---|
196 | 190 | | 23 |
---|
197 | 191 | | 24 |
---|
198 | 192 | | |
---|
199 | 193 | | 4. Ensured that all employees have read and understood the |
---|
200 | 194 | | required policies as provided in paragraph 3 of this subsection by |
---|
201 | 195 | | having an acknowledgment of understanding by the employee in |
---|
202 | 196 | | writing. Such acknowledgment shall be kept for record by the |
---|
203 | 197 | | licensed establishment for at least one (1) year after the date the |
---|
204 | 198 | | employee was terminated. |
---|
205 | 199 | | D. A licensed establishment asserting th e affirmative defense |
---|
206 | 200 | | under this act shall provide to the ABLE Commission, not later t han |
---|
207 | 201 | | ten (10) days after receipt of an administrative notice of |
---|
208 | 202 | | violation, an affidavit indicating that the licensed establishment |
---|
209 | 203 | | was in compliance with the requirements of this act at the time of |
---|
210 | 204 | | the violation for which the administrative notice was issue d, which |
---|
211 | 205 | | shall include a copy of the valid employee license held by the |
---|
212 | 206 | | employee who committed the alleged violation, a copy of the current |
---|
213 | 207 | | training certificate held by that employee, and a signed copy of |
---|
214 | 208 | | acknowledgment of receipt of polic ies by the employee. At a hearing |
---|
215 | 209 | | in which the licensed establishment asserts the affirmative defense |
---|
216 | 210 | | crated by this act, the licensed establishment may be required to |
---|
217 | 211 | | present additional evidence to support such defense. |
---|
218 | 212 | | E. When an employee does not possess a currently v alid employee |
---|
219 | 213 | | license from the ABLE Commission, the action of the employee shall |
---|
220 | 214 | | be attributable to the licensed establishment. |
---|
221 | 215 | | F. Proof by the ABLE Commission that an employee performed an |
---|
222 | 216 | | action described in this act on three or more occasions within a |
---|
223 | 217 | | |
---|
226 | 219 | | 2 |
---|
227 | 220 | | 3 |
---|
228 | 221 | | 4 |
---|
229 | 222 | | 5 |
---|
230 | 223 | | 6 |
---|
231 | 224 | | 7 |
---|
232 | 225 | | 8 |
---|
233 | 226 | | 9 |
---|
234 | 227 | | 10 |
---|
235 | 228 | | 11 |
---|
236 | 229 | | 12 |
---|
237 | 230 | | 13 |
---|
238 | 231 | | 14 |
---|
239 | 232 | | 15 |
---|
240 | 233 | | 16 |
---|
241 | 234 | | 17 |
---|
242 | 235 | | 18 |
---|
243 | 236 | | 19 |
---|
244 | 237 | | 20 |
---|
245 | 238 | | 21 |
---|
246 | 239 | | 22 |
---|
247 | 240 | | 23 |
---|
248 | 241 | | 24 |
---|
249 | 242 | | |
---|
250 | 243 | | twelve-month period shall create a rebuttable presumption that a |
---|
251 | 244 | | licensed establishment has indirectly encouraged a violation of the |
---|
252 | 245 | | law pursuant to this act. The rebuttable presumption is created |
---|
253 | 246 | | regardless of whether the employee performing the action described |
---|
254 | 247 | | in this subsection on a second or subsequent occasion is the same |
---|
255 | 248 | | employee who performed the initial action. Proof of violation shall |
---|
256 | 249 | | be demonstrated by: |
---|
257 | 250 | | 1. Producing final orders issued by the ABLE Commission or a |
---|
258 | 251 | | court of competent jurisdicti on finding that the licensed |
---|
259 | 252 | | establishment violated this act on two past occasions; and |
---|
260 | 253 | | 2. Establishing a prima facie case that an employee of the |
---|
261 | 254 | | licensed establishment violated this act on a third or subsequent |
---|
262 | 255 | | occasion. |
---|
263 | 256 | | G. Proof of violation of this a ct shall be for the same type of |
---|
264 | 257 | | offense and shall have occurred within a twelve -month period, as |
---|
265 | 258 | | calculated from the dates the incidents occurred. |
---|
266 | 259 | | H. At a hearing in which the licensed establishment asserts the |
---|
267 | 260 | | affirmative defense established in this act , the ABLE Commission may |
---|
268 | 261 | | present evidence to establish a rebuttable presumption under this |
---|
269 | 262 | | act. If the evidence is sufficient to establish a prima facie case, |
---|
270 | 263 | | the burden of persuasion in the proceeding shifts to the licensed |
---|
271 | 264 | | establishment to show that it has not indirectly encouraged a |
---|
272 | 265 | | violation of the law within the meaning of this act. |
---|
273 | 266 | | |
---|